D as A Better C?

Francesco Cattoglio francesco.cattoglio at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 13:34:34 PST 2014


On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 19:43:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> The idea is to be able to use a subset of D that does not 
> require any of druntime or phobos - it can be linked merely 
> with the C standard library.
>
> What do you think?

I don't do embedded, so my opinion is just an opinion.

I don't see any big issue with having some extra work.
Do you think it would be easier to create this after having 
switched to "DDMD"?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list