D as A Better C?

[Chris Williams]

I'd say that "D as a Better C++" would have merit. Those would 
wanted to avoid classes could do so, so you'd have already 
achieved "D as a Better C" by doing it, without having to product 
a different language reference. Point in fact, there shouldn't be 
any difference in the language references other than that in the 
GC-less variant, you have to call "delete" to free memory, do 
some extra magic to work with ranges, and Phobos isn't included.