D as A Better C?
Mike
none at none.com
Tue Feb 11 18:22:56 PST 2014
On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 02:18:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I prefer the idea already mentioned of making a more
> well-defined
> separation of D-core (static stuff), and then the rest as a
> higher layer.
> Ie, rather than 'EmbeddeD' which suggests a _removal_ of stuff,
> if D
> existed as 2 layers, then rather than removing the top layer,
> you're simply
> not adding the top layer. If that makes sense.
An Excellent Idea!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list