Close D1 bugs?

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 11 19:17:45 PST 2014


On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:54:29 -0500, Daniel Murphy  
<yebbliesnospam at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Steven Schveighoffer"  wrote in message  
> news:op.xa4tq0hzeav7ka at stevens-macbook-pro.local...
>
>> I noticed Vladimir closed a D1 bug as WORKSFORME, with an explanation  
>> that it is fixed in the latest version of D2 phobos, not realizing it  
>> was a D1 bug. (https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1004)
>>
>> However, it brought up a discussion of what to do with D1 bugs. Should  
>> they be closed? If so, what should be the reason for closing? My  
>> impression is if the bug still exists (and I'm not advocating we test  
>> for it), we should close it as WONTFIX, since D1 is deprecated.
>>
>> Thoughts? I closed the aforementioned bug as WONTFIX. Anyone is free to  
>> correct that if you feel it's in error :)
>
> The is the unfortunate consequence of putting a bug from two different  
> projects in the same report.  Ideally the D1 portion would be WONTFIX,  
> and the D2 part would be WORKSFORME/FIXED/etc.
>
> Since we can't actually do that, I think we should just discard the D1  
> information and give it the appropriate status for D2.  After all, we're  
> not going to fix the bug for 2.061 or 2.062 or 2.063 etc either, but we  
> won't mark it WONTFIX because of that.

Hm... there didn't seem to be any indication that it was D2 related. In  
any case, I was speaking about D1-only bugs.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list