Close D1 bugs?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/13/14, 6:28 PM, Joseph Cassman wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 20:00:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 2/13/2014 10:34 AM, francesco cattoglio wrote:
>>> Also, the current open issues list is HUGE, cutting it down by
>>> discarding outdated stuff would be nice. Or at least, would
>>> *look* nice. Honestly, the first time I took a look at D I was
>>> like "wait, is this a programming language or a testbed for some
>>> strange compiler?" :P
>>
>> Restrict your search for open bugs to "D2" and "D1 & D2" and you'll be
>> fine.
>
> I never thought to do that as I have just gone by the "Bug Tracker"
> graphic on the website up until now. Interesting idea. Here is a chart
> comparing how the number of open bugs changes when those two filters are
> applied to the "Bug Tracker" queries.
>                           Before   After
> Regression               9        9
> Blocker                  17       17
> Critical                 69       63
> Major                    221      206
> Normal, minor, trivial   1923     1420
> Enhancement              1153     866
> All Open                 3392     2586
>
> That large of a difference surprised me. Seems like it would help with
> the impression of quality to someone first coming to the site by
> displaying the data filtered for D2 instead. It also seems more accurate
> since the D1 only stuff is not really being worked on and that page
> presents sort of a TODO list.

So did you filter for "D2" and "D1 & D2"? That may be missing stuff, as 
Daniel mentioned.

I think it should be fine to mark D1 enhancement requests as WONTFIX, 
what does Sociomantic think?


Andrei