Better C++?

Asman01 jckj33 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 14 13:40:22 PST 2014


On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 19:28:34 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
> Is that not just C+++? When the gc and allocation gets fixed
> we'll end up with C++++?
>
> Then don't we have D = C^n for some n? Does this hold for
> negative numbers? Complex numbers?

I don't what number n would be but the n for C++++ give C#... we 
need a number positive greater than this. :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list