D as A Better C?

[Kagamin]

On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 17:37:20 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 17:21:09 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> _d_array_bounds must report the location of error, so it 
>> should take ModuleInfo and line number to report, where it 
>> happened.
>
> It could simply take a string. That's all druntime does anyway: 
> fetch m.name from moduleinfo then proceed normally.

With single pointer the calling code is more minimal. Also it's 
more conceptual: D is module-oriented and with module name you 
don't need file name. What's problem with moduleinfo? It's only 8 
bytes + module name.