[Fwd: Re: [go-nuts] Re: Generics false dichotomy]

Araq rumpf_a at web.de
Thu Feb 20 13:52:24 PST 2014


> The thing here is that those people who are actually using Go 
> for real
> problems, are finding ways of using the interface{} construct 
> to achieve
> polymorphism for the problems they are solving, Thus the 
> evidence is
> building that Go as it is is effective and efficacious without 
> generics.
>

The thing here is that those people who are actually using 
assembler for real problems, are finding ways of using the 'goto' 
construct to achieve control flow for the problems they are 
solving. Thus the evidence is
building that assembler as it is is effective and efficacious 
without structured control flow mechanims.


> The analysis that is missing here is what
> works and doesn't work with and without generics. We have some 
> evidence
> just no final conclusion.
> 

The analysis that is missing here is what works and doesn't work 
with and without structured control flow. We have some evidence 
just no final conclusion.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list