Formal review of std.lexer

[H. S. Teoh]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 07:18:58PM -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
[...]
> Note that I as badly as I want std.lexer to be included I want it to
> pass a rigorous review. This review (and, is passing, subsequent
> inclusion) has opened up an opportunity to start using D at work
> that I did not expect and so I am kind of excited about it.
[...]

Me too, I'm looking forward to a well-designed lexer generator in
Phobos. I will have lots of uses for it.

Sadly, I haven't had the time to review the proposed code as closely as
I'd like.


T

-- 
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.