Cumulative

[Tofu Ninja]

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 11:13:44 UTC, Shammah Chancellor 
wrote:
> On 2014-02-25 05:38:15 +0000, Jesse Phillips said:
>
>> When I've had a need for base classes to call super class 
>> functions, I certainly wanted a way to enforce it. I just 
>> don't know if it would just lead to other OOP design problems.
>
> Sounds like a good reason to use unittests to me.   The 
> compiler can't possibly deal with all the different ways you 
> might want to enforce an OOP pattern in a particular program.   
> Introducing more keywords does not seem like a fix.
>
> -S.

As unit tests are optional, they are in no way an enforcement. 
And for library writers(which is who this idea is mainly for I 
think), writing unit tests to try and test user written code 
seems a little unreasonable, especially as they don't have access 
to the code :/