Formal review of std.lexer

Dicebot public at dicebot.lv
Tue Feb 25 15:25:52 PST 2014


On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 20:48:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> I don't like it being a new top level module. I would name it 
> std.language.lexer or std.lang.lexer.

Don't know if it makes sense to introduce random package 
categorizatin. I'd love to see more hierarchy in Phobos too but 
we'd first need to agree to package separation principles then.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list