Formal review of std.lexer

[Brian Schott]

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 23:17:56 UTC, Meta wrote:
> std.lexer could be the umbrella for a bunch of different 
> lexers. Then we could have std.lexer.xml, std.lexer.json, etc.

I think that's a bit backwards. I'd rather have

std.d.lexer
std.d.ast
std.d.parser

than

std.lexer.d
std.parser.d
std.ast.d