Formal review of std.lexer

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Wed Feb 26 07:18:34 PST 2014


On 2/25/14, 10:58 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 23:17:56 UTC, Meta wrote:
>> std.lexer could be the umbrella for a bunch of different lexers. Then
>> we could have std.lexer.xml, std.lexer.json, etc.
>
> I think that's a bit backwards. I'd rather have
>
> std.d.lexer
> std.d.ast
> std.d.parser
>
> than
>
> std.lexer.d
> std.parser.d
> std.ast.d

I think we wouldn't want to add one more package for each language 
supported.

Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list