std.complex

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 23:54:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> (It also leaves std.complex' behaviour incompatible with 
>> std::complex and other
>> library implementations, though I guess that's less of a 
>> concern so long as we
>> think what std.complex does is right.)
>
> Making it behave differently than others would be a disaster.

Just as well that I was speaking hypothetically about things that 
_could_ be done, rather than _should_ be ... :-)