Understanding and new language feature proposal

[Sumit Adhikari]

Too bad that I cannot reply all.

Dear people,

Requesting for a domain specific data type is not a sin :D.

If there can be support for arbitrary precision floating point 
number, then there can be arbitrary precision bit-vector :D. 
Libraries are good, but they depends on library writer! that's 
all I wanted to say. Do not want to up-cast and then down-cast or 
vice-versa. I just requested for a clean thing which will be used 
a lot if available.




On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 11:27:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> 06-Jan-2014 14:31, Sumit Adhikari пишет:
>>
>> This is a great syntax and I am doing this :p.
>>
>> But there are many many many many issues associated with this 
>> (I
>> mentioned that I wanted them natively, templates are 
>> problems). The
>> library needed a significant coding and still to match with 
>> immutable,
>> support from phobos - it is tough.....
>>
>
> So you want to put this burden on compiler writers. Can't 
> really sympathize ;)