D - Unsafe and doomed
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:55:59 PST 2014
On Tuesday, 7 January 2014 at 04:37:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/6/2014 7:20 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014 at 03:18:01 UTC, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>> Or you could amend the documentation to say that null checks
>>> will not be
>>> removed even if they occur after a dereference.
>> Which won't be true with LDC and GDC.
>
> You're assuming that LDC and GDC are stuck with C semantics.
Unless we plan to rewrite our own optimizer, they are to some
extent.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list