Declaration syntax
H. S. Teoh
hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Tue Jan 7 22:12:44 PST 2014
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:10:04AM +0000, Ross Hays wrote:
> > pow : real base, real exponent -> real
> > {
> > // Variable declaration
> > tmp1 : real;
> >
> > // Variable declaration with initializer
> > result : real = dotDotDotMagic(base, exponent, tmp1);
> >
> > // Statement as usual
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> >
> >T
>
> I generally prefer the C style declarations that we already have in
> D, but that syntax is pretty nice too...
I like C style declarations too, but as someone said, it's a matter of
what you're accustomed to. The above was just my idea of the what-if
scenario where we redesign D syntax (I doubt it's ever going to happen,
definitely not happening in D2, and probably won't be in D3 either, if
we ever get to that point).
T
--
Customer support: the art of getting your clients to pay for your own incompetence.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list