Should this work?

[Marco Leise]

Am Fri, 10 Jan 2014 02:21:35 +1000
schrieb Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com>:

> On 10 January 2014 01:56, Marco Leise <Marco.Leise at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > Am Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:20:26 +1000
> > schrieb Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Awesome! Although it looks like you still have a lot of work ahead of
> > you :)
> >
> > So... when was std.simd going to be in Phobos again? :p
> >
> 
> When there are a zillion unit tests >_<
> And I kinda wanna prove it is efficient on other architectures before it is
> committed to the stone tablet that is phobos; that can never be changed
> once committed.
 
I Phobos should follow OpenGL in this regard and use a
prefix like `etc` for useful but not finalized modules, so
early adapters can try out new modules compare them with any
existing API in Phobos where applicable (e.g. streams,
json, ...) and report any issues. I have a feeling that right
now most modules are tested by 2 people prior to the merge,
because they spent a life in obscurity.

-- 
Marco