Should this work?

[marcpmichel]

On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 14:30:05 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-01-10 15:13, marcpmichel wrote:
>> I can't understand why you need two methods; maybe there's a 
>> very good
>> reason for that.
>
> For optimization reasons. You don't always need both 
> "popFront" and "front".

mkay; this is a good reason indeed.
But maybe a simple pop() similar to the popFrontRet() above 
method could be added to the library. I know I looked for it the 
first time.