Should LLVM become the default D-lang platform?

[David Nadlinger]

On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 13:22:52 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Remember when I told you that LLVM devs reverted commits made 
> by core
> GCC developers because apparently there was no explicit 
> contribution by them to LLVM?  :-)

I don't recall the details, but I don't see how this is relevant 
to this discussion. There is a difference between requiring 
copyright assignment from contributors and being cautious about 
including code that you suspect to be incompatible with the (more 
liberal) license of your project.

David