immutable bug?

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/12/2014 07:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/12/14 8:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu"  wrote in message
>> news:laugbo$2jcq$3 at digitalmars.com...
>>> Yep. Has this been placed in bugzilla? It's rather hi-pri.
>>
>> If this isn't https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11503 - it
>> most likely has the same cause.
>
> Put $150 on this.
> https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325974-type-system-breaking-caused-by-implicit-conversion-for-the-value-returned-from-pure-function
>
>
> Andrei

This issue was trivial, and yet was assigned a higher bounty than e.g. 
fixing CTFE performance, which requires a large investment as far as I 
understand. This raises the question of how bountied issues are 
selected. There are other serious problems with the type system 
implementation, eg:

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9149
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10376
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9148

On a related note, I think it makes no sense to put a bounty on the 
"Object not const-correct" issue. What would someone be required to do 
in order to get the bounty for that issue?