extend "in" to all array types
Meta
jared771 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 15 09:00:35 PST 2014
On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 15:51:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 15:38:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 15:30:35 UTC, pplantinga
>> wrote:
>>> Is there any chance we could extend this to every kind of
>>> array?
>>
>> Probably not, since there's a significant speed difference
>> between in associative array and in regular array. For a
>> regular array, it means potentially looping over every item in
>> the array. As a general rule, D likes to make long loops
>> obvious in some way, like a different function name.
>>
>> There are functions which do the same thing. Notably,
>> std.algorithm.canFind
>>
>> import std.algorithm;
>> if(array.canFind(x)) { /* do something */ }
>>
>>
>> You could also define your own function In if you wanted to
>> keep the order that way:
>>
>> bool In(T)(T lookFor, T[] lookIn) {
>> import std.algorithm;
>> return lookIn.canFind(lookFor);
>> }
>>
>> if(x.In(array)) { /* do something */ }
>>
>> It is capitalized so it doesn't clash with the keyword, and
>> still uses the dot - it is a function called with dot syntax
>> instead of an operator - but it works.
>
> or:
>
> import std.functional : binaryReverseArgs;
> import std.algorithm : canFind;
>
> alias In = binaryReverseArgs!canFind;
Programming in D is constantly mind-blowing as you realize how
powerful the language is.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list