SHA-3 is KECCAK

[Chris Cain]

On Sunday, 19 January 2014 at 15:09:46 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> Consequence of a 2-document collision is big enough, that a 
> 12-document collision doesn't pose any notably bigger threat. 
> Nostradamus is all they could come up with, which is laughable. 
> If they upgrade this to an actual partial 3.6-bit preimage 
> attack, and one collision takes 2 days as they say, for a 
> comparison, with such partial preimage attack, full preimage 
> attack on a 32-bit hash like crc32 will take 2^^(32-3.6)*2 days 
> = 1959870 years in an ideal case.

By the way, I didn't respond to this, but I suppose I should.

https://code.google.com/p/tweakcrc/
http://blog.fortinet.com/trash-crc32/

Hence why you should keep your butt out of cryptography 
discussions until you take any class on it at the very least. 
Your calculation is garbage and shows how you haven't a single 
clue about what you are talking about.

Again, you can have the last word, but I'm certain I'm done here 
regardless. If you can't see the fact that you aren't smarter 
than the experts by now (with the above) then I don't think I can 
convince you with my words. Experience is the best teacher 
sometimes. I just hope that I never accidentally use a program 
you write expecting my data to be secure.