Review of std.signal

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2014-01-23 19:26, Dicebot wrote:

> digitalmars.D.review is better. We only review Phobos module that way
> now but it can be extended.
>
> Related offtopic:
>
> I wonder sometimes if it can/should be generalized for any important
> decision making involving community. Currently only Phobos reviews live
> with their own somewhat independent life, everything else is process
> bottleneck mandating some intervention from small core team. Probably
> investing into some tooling here can result in a great benefit.

I agree. There are also many DIP's which are just sitting in the wiki.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg