Should this work?

[Peter Alexander]

On Saturday, 25 January 2014 at 11:43:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 January 2014 at 10:15:30 UTC, Peter Alexander 
> wrote:
>> If this works:
>>
>>    contains("hello", "el");
>>
>> then this should work:
>>
>>    contains([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [2, 3]);
>>
>> Special cases are pure evil. There's nothing special about 
>> strings in this case.
>
> I don't disagree, but naming and intuitive semantics should 
> match up. In this case it does not. "contains" signifies  set 
> membership.
>
> hasSequence/findSequence would be more appropriate

100% agree. The key thing is that it should be consistent between 
strings and other range types.