Should unittests run as logical part of compilation?

[Alix Pexton]

On 27/01/2014 4:15 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/26/14 8:08 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 03:58:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Yeppers. One other thought I had was to define a special flag e.g.
>>> --4c5ad7908c2aa1b3de32ea25968cdf49 that says "just run unittests".
>>
>> I really think it would be better to use
>> --4c5ad7908c2aa1b3de42ea25968cdf49 instead, it just makes the intent
>> clearer.
>
> I'm just saying it should not clash with any application argument.
>
> Andrei

Hows about making it so that unittests are only run if the executable 
name has a "_ut" suffix, or some other special name/convention?

A...

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com