Testing some singleton implementations

Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Fri Jan 31 03:44:40 PST 2014


On 1/31/14, Benjamin Thaut <code at benjamin-thaut.de> wrote:
> For x86 CPUs you don't really need MemoryOrder.acq as reads are atomic
> by default.

Hmm, I guess we could use a version(X86) block to pick this. When you
say x86, do you also imply X86_64? Where can I read about the memory
reads being atomic by default?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list