Option!T

[Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d]

On 2013-12-10 17:28:26 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu said:

> I talked to a programmer who knows Scala (among others) and he 
> mentioned the usefulness of the Option type - a zero or one element 
> collection (range in D terminology). Here's an article discussing it: 
> http://danielwestheide.com/blog/2012/12/19/the-neophytes-guide-to-scala-part-5-the-option-type.html 
> 
> 
> We have only(x) (http://dlang.org/phobos/std_range.html#.only) to be a 
> collection of exactly one value, but not a type for "a value of type T 
> or nothing at all". Should we follow Scala's example and add it?
> 
> 
> Andrei

Did anything ever come of this?  If there's nothing in Phobos yet, I 
can start working on it and submit a PR.   If we can get this 
formalized and into the good usage, it seems like we would not need a 
.? operator.

-Shammah