DIP65: Fixing Exception Handling Syntax

[David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:20:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Give it a rest. If 'void foo(int, float)' is ok so should 
> 'catch (E)'
> be. We can change the spec if we have to, it's easier than 
> breaking code.

Huh? Brian explicitly remarked earlier that

> Implementing the spec, i.e. requiring exceptions to be named, 
> would break far more code than what I propose,

and the DIP doesn't contain anything to that effect either

I'm a bit puzzled as to what the controversy is supposed to be 
about.

David