critique of vibe.d

[Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 09:48:32 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 09:47:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 20:39:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
>> wrote:
>>> "has anyone ever tied a real webservice to vibe.d?"
>>
>> Yes and see no problems with it. Looks like author has very 
>> specific expectations of "webservice" concept and can't do a 
>> thing with 100%
>
> .. coverage of all utilities in the library. Sad he does not
> provide some sample of missing bits. Most likely he has 
> expected vibe.d to be exclusively web framework while it is 
> generic networking / async framework.

Yeah, connection-based protocols are where UDS really shines for 
supporting seamless upgrades.  Transaction-based protocols like 
HTTP are much easier to deal with in this respect.