Opportunities for D

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/9/2014 9:08 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I would, except that I'm unsure of exactly what is needed in said
> design.

I'm unsure as well. That's why design work is needed!

> Are we just trying to nail down the exact semantics of 'scope'?
> Or are we looking at implementational issues (possible compiler
> performance hits)? Or both? Or something else altogether? Do we need to
> account for (what little exists of) the current implementation? Speaking
> of which, what *is* the current extent of the implementation of 'scope'?
> I assume it isn't just a no-op, since I see it applied to delegate
> parameters every now and then?

Yes, yes, yes, ... these are questions that all need investigation and answering.