critique of vibe.d

[Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d]

Am Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:28:42 +0000
schrieb "Dicebot" <public at dicebot.lv>:

> On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 17:05:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > Completely off-topic, but:
> >
> > Have you considered making vibe http-backend independent?
> > So that it could provide a fcgi interface or be included in an 
> > nginx
> > plugin?
> 
> What is the benefit as opposed to using proxy_pass at nginx? fcgi 
> will be slower than built-in vibe.d HTTP server.

FCGI was only an example. I guess the only benefit is that the webserver
can spawn fcgi backends when it starts and files with certain
extensions can be handled with these backends.

But that's of course only useful with shared libraries / pages.