Opportunities for D

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 09/07/14 15:45, Meta wrote:

> As far as I know, there's no reason we can't add pattern matching to
> switch or final switch or both. There's no ambiguity because right now
> it's not possible to switch on structs or classes. See Kenji's DIP32 for
> syntax for tuples that could be leveraged.

There's no reason why we can add a completely new construct for this 
either. But it's usually easier to get a new function into Phobos then 
changing the language.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg