Opportunities for D

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:54:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:13:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> Dicebot:
>>
>>> I can't blame Sonke or anyone else for not wanting to waste 
>>> his time on pushing more stuff upstream considering how 
>>> miserable contribution experience is right now.
>>
>> This was one of the causes of the creation of Tango and its 
>> fiasco, so better to not repeat that.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> No one but Walter / Andrei can do anything about it. Right now 
> we are in weird situation when they call for "lieutenants" but 
> are not ready to abandon decision power. It can't possibly work 
> that way. No amount of volunteer effort will help when so many 
> PR stall waiting for resolution comment from one of language 
> "generals".

To be fair to Walter/Andrei, you need to be clear who your 
lieutenant is before you can delegate to them.

Who has stepped up to take charge of concurrency in D?