critique of vibe.d

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:50:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 13:55:14 UTC, Chris wrote:
>> Would you be interested in putting a web development framework 
>> (or parts of it) together we can tie in with vibe.d?
>
> Meh, not really. I've never used vibe.d so getting started is 
> at least a psychological hurdle and I have a lot of other 
> things to do too. I have considered doing a vibe backend for 
> cgi.d before, which should be possible and maybe not even too 
> hard, but just not far up on my priority list.
>
> Many of my modules are made to stand alone though. Pulling 
> dom.d in should be really easy, maybe database.d too (though 
> since it uses C libraries to talk to the db server, it would 
> probably cause problems with vibe's fibers; the queries would 
> block the whole server).
>
> web.d is really ugly code, it was my first serious usage of D's 
> reflection and while it works, I'd love to rewrite it some day. 
> I think I'd prefer to do web.d 2.0 before doing the vibe stuff.

I see.