critique of vibe.d

Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 10 11:10:49 PDT 2014


On 7/10/2014 10:50 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> maybe database.d too (though since it uses C
> libraries to talk to the db server, it would probably cause problems
> with vibe's fibers; the queries would block the whole server).
>

All you should really need to do is replace usage of Phobos's socket 
type with Vibe.d's socket type. There's a slight difference in API, but 
there are plans for a wrapper to handle those differences automatically:

https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/702



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list