Thread-local GC?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 02:51:05 UTC, logicchains wrote:
> I was wondering if thread-local GC had been considered an 
> option for making D's GC work better in threaded code? Erlang 
> has this (well, process-local GC, which is closer to 
> fibre-local in D terms) and it seems to work okay, although I 
> don't think Erlang allows shared memory between processes.
>
> If this were possible, it would be particularly useful if it 
> could be combined with nogc to allow the spawning of nogc 
> threads. These could be used for latency-sensitive work, with 
> the guarantee that work done in a nogc thread would never be 
> paused by garbage collection done in other threads.

I'm beating that drum for 2 years. SDC do not give me enough
bandwidth to handle that one.