Proposal for design of 'scope' (Was: Re: Opportunities for D)

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:56:10AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 10/07/14 20:15, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> 
> >	class C {}
> >	C myFunc(C obj) {
> >		obj.doSomething();
> >		return obj; // will be rejected if parameters are scoped by default
> >	}
> 
> Hmm, why wouldn't that work? The scope where you called "myFunc" is
> guaranteed to outlive "myFunc".
[...]

Because the scope of the parameter 'obj' is defined to be the scope of
myFunc only, according to the current proposal.


T

-- 
What are you when you run out of Monet? Baroque.