Review: std.logger

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:39:09 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:36:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Round of a formal review before proceeding to voting. Subject 
>> for Phobos inclusion : http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger 
>> authored by Robert Schadek.
>
> Is this for std.* or std.experimental.*?
>
> David

Deciding this is subject of this review/voting iteration too - it 
is mostly matter of API stability, how much of a trust reviewers 
are ready to put into existing API.

Personally I believe that for something like logging library 
stabilization period of one release cycle in std.experimental is 
desirable because wider usage is very likely to result in 
breaking change suggestions.