Review: std.logger

[Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:39:09 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:36:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Round of a formal review before proceeding to voting. Subject 
>> for Phobos inclusion : http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger 
>> authored by Robert Schadek.
>
> Is this for std.* or std.experimental.*?
>
> David

I'm of the opinion we should review for std.* and vote for 
std.experimental.*

Prior to or during beta we vote to move into std.*