Review: std.logger

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 03:22:10 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:39:09 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:36:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Round of a formal review before proceeding to voting. Subject 
>>> for Phobos inclusion : 
>>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger authored by Robert 
>>> Schadek.
>>
>> Is this for std.* or std.experimental.*?
>>
>> David
>
> I'm of the opinion we should review for std.* and vote for 
> std.experimental.*
>
> Prior to or during beta we vote to move into std.*

Agreed.