Review: std.logger

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jul 12 13:42:52 PDT 2014


On 7/12/14, 4:04 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 03:22:10 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:39:09 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>>> On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 14:36:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>>> Round of a formal review before proceeding to voting. Subject for
>>>> Phobos inclusion : http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger authored
>>>> by Robert Schadek.
>>>
>>> Is this for std.* or std.experimental.*?
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> I'm of the opinion we should review for std.* and vote for
>> std.experimental.*
>>
>> Prior to or during beta we vote to move into std.*
>
> Agreed.

That's nice. Doing laps in std.experimental for one release cycle can 
only improve form. Let's. -- Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list