Review: std.logger

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 11:19:20 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 07:14:50 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>>
>>> ... I'd almost always prefer a non-string-mixin solution.
>>>
>>> ... actually writing out the different signatures ...
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>
>
> I also think that the usage of mixins in std.log is an "unforced
> error" and non-idiomatic D code.
>

But creating x , necessary, function with only slightly different 
names is also very non idiomatic D code. Anyway I'm working on 
that.