Review: std.logger

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 11:25:51 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-07-11 16:36, Dicebot wrote:
>> Round of a formal review before proceeding to voting. Subject 
>> for Phobos
>> inclusion : http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger authored 
>> by Robert
>> Schadek.
>
> * The free functions are not documented
The compiler does not create ddoc for mixined source

> * The API of the free functions look complicated and have 
> cryptic names
> * What's the EBNF for? Seems complicated as well

The names are quite easy if you look at the bnf.