DIP62: Volatile type qualifier for unoptimizable variables in embedded programming

Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jul 16 12:03:47 PDT 2014


On 16 July 2014 19:58, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 7/16/2014 7:31 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>>
>>> They are _trivial_ to implement for any of the compilers.
>>
>> No they aren't, unless you are talking specifically about volatile.,
>>
>> in which case, that depends...
>
>
> If the compiler back end doesn't support volatile, then it's a problem
> regardless of how the front end handles it, so the point is moot.
>
> In any case, the compiler front end can always implement an intrinsic by
> just calling a function.
>
>

I was thinking:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list