LinkedIn Article to be: Why you need to start moving off C/C++ to D, now.

[Araq via Digitalmars-d]

> Yes, and my point was that you pay for the (implicit) 
> deallocation by
> the need to copy all live objects. The cost of copying is not 
> zero
> compared to a non-copying GC. No matter how you do it, the cost 
> has to
> be paid *somewhere*. It's just a question of which method will 
> be less
> costly based on what your application does.

The cost models are vastly different and as you finally note 
application dependent. *The* cost does not have to paid 
*somewhere* because there is not a single cost to begin with.