Integer overflow and underflow semantics?
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 20 11:14:39 PDT 2014
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 11:09:45 UTC, Tobias Müller wrote:
> "Marc Schütz" <schuetzm at gmx.net> wrote:
>> On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 19:49:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 08:34:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>>>> Can't it simply generate code as is? Seems wasteful to spend
>>>> >> compilation time on this.
>>>
>>> Not if you want fast code, consider a template with:
>>>
>>> if (a.length+M < b.length+N) {}
>>>
>>> then you alias b = a in the template instantiation:
>>>
>>> if(a.length+M < a.length+N){}
>>>
>>> you want this reduced to:
>>>
>>> if (M<N){
>>> }
>>>
>>> which can be resolved at compile time.
>>
>> Yes, but that is the optimizer's job. The front-end doesn't
>> need to spend
>> time on it, if the back-end then anyway does the same
>> optimization again.
>
> I don't think anyone has said that the frontend does that.
I do ;-) This is how I interpret Kagamin's post.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list