Software Assurance Reference Dataset

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 07/23/2014 12:14 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>> Sure, that part of the discussion grew out of the claim that there are
>> "no
>> loops" there.
>
> Bending a language over backwards

Not what happened.

> to be pedantic

Being pedantic is important enough.

> is pointless for this discussion.

If one doesn't want "pointless" "pedantry" my suggestion would be to not 
make wrong claims about apparently irrelevant things, or to ignore the 
rebuttal to communicate silent agreement.

> Nobody claims "Obfuscated C Contest" entries are best (or
> even suggested) practices.

Irrelevant. I'll leave here.