opCmp and opEquals woes

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 06:18:34 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Ola Fosheim Grøstad" " wrote in message 
> news:qxtukjuohhzngcutmmpz at forum.dlang.org...
>
>> On Wednesday, 23 July 2014 at 23:02:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh via 
>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> >> fuzzy numbers it gets even worse. You can define it such 
>> >> that a<b and
>> >> b>a both are true...
>> >
>> > (a<b && b>a) is true for ints.
>>
>> That was a typo, for fuzzy numbers you can define less than 
>> such that a<b and b>a both are true.
>>
>> Fuzzy(-1,0,1) vs Fuzzy(-2,0,2)
>
> a<b and b>a can be true for ints.

So I keep making the same typo :P...

For fuzzy numbers you can define less than such that a<b and b<a 
both are true... yes?