WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes
w0rp via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 24 04:22:45 PDT 2014
I wonder. If opCmp is supposed to imply partial ordering, then
that means opCmp should imply the antisymmetric property of
partial ordering. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PartialOrder.html
a <= b and b <= a implies a = b.
That would mean for us that opEquals being generated with opCmp
== 0 would make sense.
Without that transitive property, it would imply only that it was
a preorder, but not a partial order.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Preorder.html
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list